AMD mobile processors. Comparison of processors for laptops (AMD and Intel) AMD chips for organizing mid-range laptops

This article presents only the best AMD processors in 2017.

If you do not want to independently understand all the characteristics of each processor model or are not sure that you can choose the best option, take a look at our CPU rating from AMD.

Content:

A good processor is the main indicator of power and. AMD is one of the leaders in the processor market.

AMD produces the following types of processors:

• Cpu - central computing units
• GPU - a separate device that renders video. Often used in gaming computers to reduce the load on the central unit and to provide best quality video sequence;
• APU – central processing units with built-in video accelerator. They are also called hybrid, because such a component is central and in one crystal.

# 5 - Athlon X4 860K

The AMD Athlon line is designed for Socket FM2 +. X4 860K is the best and most powerful model of the entire series, to which three processors go:

• Athlon X4 860K;
• Athlon X4840;
• and model Athlon X2.

The Athlon family is designed for the desktop personal computers... All models in the line are distinguished by good multithreading.

The best results in the Athlon group were shown by the X4 860K model.

The first detail to be noted is support for practically, which consumes no more than 95 watts along with quiet operation and no performance loss.

If the processor has been overclocked using special programs, there may be an increase in noise in the operation of the cooling system.

Main characteristics:

• Family: Athlon X4;
• The number of processor cores: 4;
• Clock frequency - 3.1 MHz;
• There is no unlocked multiplier;
• Core type: Kaveri;
• Estimated cost: $ 50.

There is no integrated graphics in the CPU.

X4 860K processor is capable of supporting fast work only general-purpose systems.

CPU testing was done using the AIDA64 utility. Overall, the model performs well for a mid-range processor.

If you are looking for an inexpensive multitasking CPU for your home computer Athlon X4 860K is one suitable option.

Athlon X4 860K testing

No. 4 - AMD FX-6300

AMD's FX-6300 is a Piledriver based CPU. Processors with such an architecture have already become worthy competitors to new products from Intel.

All processors from AMD FX group have excellent overclocking potential.

FX-6300 specifications:

• Series: FX-Series;
• Supported Socket: Socket AM3 +;
• Number of cores: 6;
• No integrated graphics
• The clock frequency is 3.5 MHz;
• Number of contacts: 938;
• The average cost of the model is $ 85.

The characteristic feature of the processor is its flexibility.

The clock frequency declared by the developer is 3.5 MHz, which is a rather mediocre figure among.

However, this CPU is capable of overclocking up to 4.1 MHz.

box of FX series devices from AMD

Acceleration of work occurs during intense loads. More often during video rendering or playing games.

It should be noted that this CPU model is equipped with a dual channel memory controller.

Processor performance tests were conducted in Just Cause 2.

The final results showed that the Athlon X4 860K supports the maximum graphics resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels.

The computer also used an integrated GTX 580 graphics card.

In the figure below, you can see a comparative analysis of performance and other processors that were tested with identical conditions of software and hardware environment.

test result Athlon X4 860K

No. 3 - A10-7890K

The A10-7890K is a hybrid CPU from AMD. Despite the announcement of the development of a fundamentally new technology and a generation of processors, AMD decided to release another model of the A10 line.

The company is positioning this series of devices as a great choice for desktop PCs.

The A10-7890K is a best-in-class playback solution.

Of course, the graphics settings will have to be reduced, but as a result, you will get good performance without severe overheating of the PC hardware.

packing model A10-7890K

This processor has an integrated Radeon graphics unit that allows you to:

The processor comes with a Wraith cooler, which features very quiet operation. Also, the cooler supports backlighting mode. Specifications A10-7890K:

• CPU family - A-Series;
• Clock frequency: 4.1 MHz;
• Connector type: Socket FM2 +;
• Number of cores: 4 cores;
• There is an unlocked multiplier;
• Number of contacts: 906;
• Estimated cost - $ 130.

The main plus of the A10-7890K is the improved interoperability with Windows 10.

The detailed characteristics of the processor are shown in the figure below:

detailed characteristics of APU A10-7890K

The results of testing a component with a standard test:

Cinebench R15 test result

As you can see, the tested component has surpassed some AMD models in the A-10 and Athlon line in its parameters.

At the same time, the results obtained were not enough to outperform Intel counterparts in performance.

# 2 - Ryzen 5 1600X

The first two places in our TOP are occupied by models of the Ryzen line. It is in the past few years that the architecture of these processors has become a key one for Advanced Micro Devices Corporation.

The presented Zen microarchitecture is gradually returning the manufacturer to its leading position in the market.

Ryzen 5 is a direct competitor for the group's processors. The CPU is at its best in gaming systems. This is also stated by the CEO of AMD.

Specifications:

• AMD Ryzen 5 family;
• 6 cores;
• No integrated graphics;
• There is an unlocked multiplier;
• Clock frequency 3.6 MHz;
• Socket AM4;
• The cost is about $ 260.

Most of the 1600X modifications are devoid of a native one. Users will have to purchase this component separately.

The base frequencies do not cross the established 3.6 MHz mark. When working in turbo mode (as a result of overclocking the processor), the clock frequency reaches 4.0 MHz.

All 5th Gen Ryzen models support SMT - Surface Mount Technology.

Thus, the CPU can be easily mounted on the surface of the PCB without the need to cut parts of the component.

Ryzen 5 package

In the process of testing the CPU operation even with the most resource-intensive programs, the maximum CPU temperature did not exceed 58 degrees. , Test results:

test of work of model 1600X

Together with a line of powerful digging CPUs, AMD has also released a special firmware for their initial setup- AGESA.

The utility allows you to reconfigure memory to avoid delays and interruptions in work.

# 1 - Ryzen 7 1800X

The Ryzen 7 1800X is a great choice for building a powerful PC or for multi-tiered data server support.

AMD is currently developing another powerful member of the Ryzen family.

In March 2017, the Ryzen 2000 X APU was announced and should go on sale at the end of the year.

Specifications:

• Family: AMD Ryzen 7;
• 8 cores;
• 3.6 MHz clock rate with overclocking up to 4 MHz;
• Unlocked multiplier support;
• No support for integrated graphics;
• The average price is $ 480.

1800X can simultaneously execute up to 16 threads program code... The processor works with SMT multithreading technology.

All Zen cores ensure the efficient use of others. Increased throughput with support for three-level cache memory.

Comparison of the test results of the Ryzen 7 1800X versus competing models from Intel.

Now smartphones can process a lot of information if they want to. Their processor has enough power to solve absolutely any task. At the same time, modern chipsets consume a minimum amount of electricity, for which the improved technical process should be thanked. Our ranking of processors for smartphones will tell you about the most powerful and interesting models... Devices based on them can be blamed for anything, but definitely not for lack of power!

Good to know!

Samsung Exynos 9820

• Year of issue: 2019
• Process technology: 8 nm
• Architecture: 2 * Custom + 2 * Cortex A75 + 4 * Cortex A55
• Video accelerator: Mali-G76 MP12

Geekbench result: 4382/9570 points

An interesting fact was the emergence of a chipset from Samsung on the third place of the most powerful processors. Previously, the company's solutions in synthetic tests were inferior not only to Qualcomm, but also to Huawei, but in this case the figures for the Koreans turned out to be higher.

The novelty is built on an 8-nanometer process technology, the cores are divided into 3 groups - two own fourth-generation cores, two efficient Cortex A75 and four energy-efficient Cortex A55. Like other manufacturers, the company has focused on improving the operation of neural networks, the security of user data, as well as improving the camera and supporting a large number of sensors. So the novelty can work with 5 cameras including infrared for face scanning and a resolution of no more than 22 megapixels or two front cameras 16 megapixels each. In addition, the chipset supports 4K displays, shooting at 8K at 30 fps, 4K up to 120 fps.

Advantages:

• Instantly adjust camera settings for AR and VR.
• Supports 8K shooting.
• Work with 5 cameras.
• Economical battery consumption.
• Improved encryption of personal data of users.
• 4K video processing up to 150 fps.
• Support for 4K displays.
• Work with solid state drives UFS 2.1 / 3.0.

Disadvantages:

• 8nm process technology - even with the most ideal optimization, these chipsets cannot compete with 7nm models in energy efficiency.
• Of the 8 cores, only the first two can be called new, the remaining 6 cores migrated from the previous processors without any changes, that is, it is difficult to fully consider the new product as such - rather, it is an improved old processor.

Samsung S10, S10 +, S10e

Huawei KIRIN 980

• Year of issue: 2018
• Process technology: 7 nm
• Architecture: 2 * Cortex-A76 + 2 * Cortex A76 + 4 * Cortex A55
• Video accelerator: Mali-G76 MP10

Geekbench score: 3390/10318 points

The new processor from Huawei was technically the first to be created using the 7nm process technology, however, introducing it to the world, the company was late with the release, giving its laurels to Apple. The cores are divided into three groups - two high-performance, two energy-efficient and four medium-performance. In order for a particular task to use exactly the cores that the company needs, the company has implemented Flex-Scheduling technology, thanks to which the performance has increased by 37% compared to last year's Kirin 970. Not without a new graphics accelerator, which is not only more powerful, but also automatically increases the clock speed in games.

Like its competitors, Huawei has improved the engine block, it is 120% faster than its predecessor. In this case, these are not just words. Every year, all manufacturers are focusing on cameras and the fact that through the work of AI, pictures really turn out better in any conditions is difficult to dispute. This is best seen with Huawei. Already with last year's Kirin 970, the company has achieved first place in the most prestigious camera ranking from DxOMark. With the new processor, we can expect to surpass the previous level. A lot has been written about the photo capabilities of the chipset, or rather its neural unit. To simplify, Huawei does the following - it does not chase the top performance in tests, but makes really excellent chipsets for photos and videos, while there will be no difficulties with launching games and any other tasks. In many cases, this is what users want, who look at real possibilities, not numbers.

Advantages:

• The best processor for photos and videos.
• Two modules of neural networks.
• Supports high speed LPDDR4X RAM up to 16GB.
• Flex-Scheduling is a technology of "correct" selection of cores for specific tasks, which results in excellent energy efficiency and fast loading of any application.
• HDR10 + support.
• Support for the new standard - Wi-Fi 802.11ay.
• Work with 48MP cameras or 22MP dual modules.
• 4K recording at 60 fps.

Disadvantages:

• The graphics coprocessor is weaker than that of competitors - this is not a disadvantage for users, since there is GPU Turbo technology for automatic overclocking, which makes up for the difference.
• The company used the "old" cores and improved them, that is, in fact, this is an updated processor, and not a fundamentally new development.
• No 5G support.

Most popular smartphones: View 20, Huawei P30, Huawei Mate 20

Mediatek Helio P90

• Year of issue: 2018
• Process technology: 12 nm
• Architecture: 2 * Cortex-A75 + 6 * Cortex A55
• Video accelerator: PowerVR GM 9446

Geekbench score: 2025/6831 points

MediaTek has long been associated with processors for budget and, occasionally, mid-priced smartphones. The company is struggling to create a competitive flagship model, but it is not doing it very well. So, MediaTek did not make it to the top 10 most productive chipsets, but took 11th place with the Helio P90 released in 2019. The model has an eight-core structure, which, although there is a breakdown into two and six cores, in fact all of them are high-performance. Not surprisingly, the P90 was able to overtake the Snapdragon 710 described below, which has exactly the same cores, but with the six cores focusing on energy efficiency.

In general, the new product from MediaTek is quite interesting - there is support for the fastest RAM up to and UFS 2.1 solid-state drives, like its competitors, it can work with a single 48 megapixel camera or a dual-module solution of 24 and 16 megapixels. An interesting feature is the support for displays with a resolution of 2520 * 1080 and an aspect ratio of 21: 9. The chipset has three image processing units and the updated AI with support for AI Fusion is responsible for ensuring that tasks are distributed among all units - this increases the processing speed. One of the features of this technology is the adaptation of the screen in real time to the selected application - in particular, making a video call and switching from full screen mode video preview, users will not notice delays.

Advantages:

• Eight powerful cores for maximum performance.
• Updated AI block for working with photos.
• Supports high speed LPDDRX memory up to 8GB.
• Support for modern cameras up to 48 megapixels.
• Slow motion video shooting with fps 480 in HD format.

Disadvantages:

• Not the best energy efficiency.
• No 4K shooting.
• Old generation graphics coprocessor.

Most popular smartphones: BV9800

Qualcomm Snapdragon 710

• Year of issue: 2018
• Process technology: 10 nm
• Architecture: 2 * Cortex-A75 + 6 * Cortex A55
• Video accelerator: Adreno 616

Geekbench score: 1897/5909 points

A mid-range processor that was ranked 12th in the ranking of the most powerful chipsets. The model became the first in the 700th series. Prior to that, Qualcomm had a clear division: the 800 series is the flagship level with maximum opportunities, 600th - mid-range with trimmed GPU and CPU cores, and 400th - budget line with a minimum of features. The 700 series processors, and in particular the Snapdragon 710, are all relevant chips from the main line and, at the same time, a fairly affordable price.

The novelty runs on two high-performance cores and six energy-efficient ones. Taking into account the new graphics system, the model shows excellent performance in games and at the same time low power consumption. In addition, she knows how to process photos of high quality - reduces noise, supports two dual cameras up to 16 megapixels, and 4K video. The company did not forget about AI either, in this case the manufacturer did not waste time on trifles and installed Hexagon 685 machine cores, that is, the same as in 2018 - Snapdragon 845. The output turned out to be a fairly inexpensive chipset, which, if inferior to the flagships, is quite a bit ... For those looking for a mid-priced smartphone with excellent performance, energy efficiency and photo processing, the Snapdragon 710 will be a real godsend.

Advantages:

• Affordable price.
• Supports two cameras up to 16 MP.
• Low power consumption.
• Powerful AI to create photos.
• Supports 4K at 30fps and HDR.
• Working with biometric sensors.
• Quick Charge 4+ support.

Disadvantages:

Most popular smartphones:Samsung Galaxy A8s, 16, Xiaomi Mi8 SE

Conclusion

It is worth noting that our rating did not include the Snapdragon 845 and 660, Kirin 970, Apple A11, Exynos 8895, Helio X30 chipsets due to the fact that they were all released in late 2017 or early 2018. Despite their relevance, many readers are familiar with them, and there are a lot of smartphones based on them. For this reason, we chose powerful new products, which does not entail recommendations for buying devices based solely on them. But if you want a smartphone on the freshest and most productive chipset, then the models presented above are the best of their kind.

Excluded from selection

Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890

• Year of issue: 2016
• Technical process: 14 nm
• Architecture: Samsung Exynos M1 + ARM Cortex-A53 (ARMv8-A)
• Video accelerator: Mali-T880, 12 cores, 650 MHz

Geekbench score: 5940 points

If not the best processor for a smartphone, then at least one of those who deserve this title. It is not for nothing that all variations are equipped with it. South Korean Galaxy S7. Is it possible to blame this flagship for the lack of power? The chipset can handle 4K video at 60fps with ease. It consists of eight cores. Maximum frequency is 2290 MHz. But it is extremely rare to raise it to such a level, since lower frequencies are quite enough for solving most problems.

Unfortunately, the processor also has certain problems. It just so happened that South Korean chipsets are endowed with not the best video accelerator (GPU). Here, too, the Mali-T880, despite its 12 cores, performs strictly on the "good" rating, but nothing more. This is proved by the tests in GFXBench, where in terms of graphics Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 outperforms some of the other chipsets reviewed today.

Dignity

• Support for video in a resolution of 2160p at 60 frames / s;
• Not very hot;
• Low power consumption;
• High scores in benchmarks.

disadvantages

• The memory test does not show the best results;
• A graphics accelerator could do better.

Most popular smartphones: Samsung Galaxy S7, Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Samsung Galaxy Golden 4

Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996

• Year of issue: 2015
• Process technology: 14 nm FinFET
• Architecture: Qualcomm Kryo
• Video accelerator: Adreno 530, 624 MHz

Geekbench score: 4890 points

Qualcomm does not have its own manufacturing facilities. However, she has many patents at her disposal. And with them, it is not difficult to develop a processor close to the ideal, after which it remains only to place an order for production from other companies. pleases with both computing power and graphics processing capabilities. Many flagships that were born in 2016 were equipped with this chipset. And none of their customers complained about the graphics in mobile games!

The chip consists of only four cores. However, this did not prevent him from gaining record points in benchmarks - not least thanks to the graphics accelerator. The maximum frequency for this processor is 2150 MHz. On hardware level the chipset supports HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, and Bluetooth 4.1. In a word, the processor could easily cope even with tasks assigned to a laptop! It also features support for a camera with a resolution of up to 28 megapixels - which is why the company made its choice in favor of this processor, in whose flagship smartphones there is just such a sensor.

Dignity

• Very high resolution camera support;
• Able to handle Full HD video at up to 240fps;
• Support for 10-bit 4K video;
• DirectX 11.2 is used on Windows devices;
• Very high clock speed;
• Not very high energy consumption;
• High marks in benchmarks;
• Memory test yields high scores;
• Excellent performance in games.

disadvantages

• Sometimes it gets very hot.

Most popular smartphones: Moto Z Force, Elite X3, ZenFone 3, 10, Samsung Galaxy S7, Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Sony Xperia X Performance, Sony Xperia XR, Xiaomi Mi5 Pro, Z11

HiSilicon Kirin 95

• Year of issue: 2016
• Process technology: 16 nm
• Architecture:
• Video accelerator: Mali-T880, 4 cores

Geekbench score: 6,000 points

This chipset is made on a 16-nanometer process technology, which testifies to its decent energy efficiency. The maximum frequency here is increased to 2.5 GHz. The creators had to take such a step because of the Mali-T880 graphics accelerator, which does not cope with its task in the best way.

The Chinese chipset consists of eight cores, four of which can be called auxiliary. Paired with a GPU, it is capable of playing 4K video at 60fps. But only reproduce - the processor is only capable of creating a video on its own in 1080p resolution. And this despite the fact that the chip even supports dual cameras, the total resolution of which is 42 megapixels. It is also capable of recognizing Bluetooth 4.2 and USB 3.0 modules.

Dignity

• Support for many modern wireless technologies;
• Almost record clock speed;
• No big overheating problems;
• Can decode 4K video at 60fps;
• Supports high definition dual cameras.

disadvantages

• The graphics accelerator shows poor results.

Most popular smartphones: Huawei P9, Huawei P9 Plus, Huawei Honor V8, Huawei Honor Note 8.

HiSilicon Kirin 950

• Year of issue: 2015
• Process technology: 16 nm
• Architecture: 4x ARM Cortex-A72 + 4x ARM Cortex-A53
• Video accelerator: Mali-T880, 4 cores, 900 MHz

Geekbench score: 5950 points

In 2015-2016, this processor was used by many Huawei smartphones. The chipset consists of eight cores, the power of four of them can reach 2300 MHz. It would seem that the result is quite good. But not everything is so simple. The chip's weak point is the graphics accelerator. In its capacity, the first version of the Mali-T880 is used here. It copes well with video decoding - in theory, you can even run 4K video at 60fps. But in games, this GPU shows itself disgusting, especially by the standards of flagships.

However, you can't find fault with the processing power of this chipset, which is why it got into our top processors. The product supports Bluetooth 4.2 and USB 3.0 standards, although the Chinese giant did not really produce smartphones with such high-speed interfaces, preferring to save money. Also, in theory, the processor copes with the data stream from, which has a total resolution of 42 megapixels.

Dignity

• Supports USB 3.0 and Bluetooth 4.2;
• High computing power;
• Support for modern memory formats;
• Not very expensive to manufacture;
• Decodes video to high definition;
• Able to cope with a dual 42MP camera.

disadvantages

• The graphics accelerator could be much better;
• Can't provide 4K video to the camera.

Most popular smartphones: Huawei Honor 8, Huawei Honor Note 8, Huawei Mate 8, Huawei Honor V8.

Apple A9X APL1021

• Year of issue: 2015
• Technical process: 16 nm
• Architecture: Apple Twister 64-bit ARMv8-compatible
• Video accelerator: PowerVR Series 7X 12-core

Geekbench result : 5400 bonuses

Why are game developers primarily targeting smartphones and Apple tablets? Is it possible that only their owners can afford to buy a toy? No, everything is much simpler. It is on this technique that the games show themselves best. The Apple A9X APL1021 processor is endowed with an almost perfect graphics accelerator that can handle absolutely any task! Apple could even add 4K video at 60fps if it so desired!

As for the computing power, everything is in order with it, although the processor still does not gain record points in the benchmarks. It would seem that only two cores are used here. But this is quite enough for solving everyday tasks. Not least because of the better optimized operating system.

Dignity

• High power of two cores;
• Excellent 12-core graphics accelerator;
• Full support for 4K video at 60 fps;
• Support of many modern technologies;
• Recognizes modern memory formats.

disadvantages

Apple iPad Pro

MediaTek MT6797 Helio X25

• Year of issue: 2016
• Process technology: 20 nm
• Architecture: 2x ARM Cortex-A72 + 4x ARM Coptex-A53 + 4x ARM Coptex-A53
• Video accelerator: Mali-T880MP4, 4 cores, 850 MHz

Geekbench score: 4920 points

A processor with a rather complex structure. It consists of ten cores, belonging to two varieties. The two cores are the most powerful - they belong to the Cortex-A72 type, and their clock frequency can reach 2500 MHz. The rest of the computing cores are of the Cortex-A53 type. At the same time, half of them are overclocked to 2000 MHz, while the frequency of the rest is limited to 1550 MHz.

All this allows the processor to gain a lot of points in the benchmarks. And the result would have been even higher if not for the graphics accelerator. This element is seriously limited in its capabilities here. Yes, it supports full 4K video production, including creation, but only at 30fps. And in games, the GPU does its job even worse. As for the rest of the characteristics, support for 32-megapixel cameras and Bluetooth standard 4.1. The maximum display resolution of a smartphone with such a chipset can reach 2560 x 1600 pixels.

Dignity

• Support for a camera with a resolution of 32 megapixels;
• Very high processing power;
• Relatively low power consumption;
• Supports 4K video, albeit limited;
• Low cost of the chipset.

disadvantages

• GPU does not perform well in games;
• No Bluetooth 4.2 support.

Most popular smartphones: Meizu Pro 6, K6000 Premium, Xiaomi Redmi Pro, Speed ​​8, Apollo.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953

• Year of issue: 2016
• Process technology: 14 nm
• Architecture: ARM Cortex-A53 (ARMv8)
• Video accelerator: Adreno 506

Geekbench score: 4900 points

One of the most popular creations by Qualcomm. They are endowed with a huge number of smartphones from the mid-budget and even the top segments. The manufacturer did not bother with the architecture, endowing the chipset with eight identical cores. The maximum clock frequency is 2000 MHz, of which ordinary user quite enough.

The graphics accelerator here is optimized for processing video content. In theory, a smartphone based on this processor is capable of playing and recording 4K video at 60 frames / s. But in games, some problems begin. Although their presence is surprising, because the GPU even has support for DirectX 12, which is activated on devices with Windows on board. The chipset also supports dual cameras, the total resolution of which does not exceed 24 megapixels. The only thing missing here is USB 3.0 support. However, the creators of smartphones do not like to embed such high-speed connectors into their creations.

Dignity

• Dual camera supported;
• The technology is great fast charging;
• High power of all eight cores;
• Full support for 4K video content at 60 frames / s;
• Relatively low cost.

disadvantages

• Camera resolution cannot exceed 24 megapixels;
• No Bluetooth 4.2 support;
• Display resolution cannot exceed 1920 x 1200 pixels;
• In games, the chipset does not perform well.

Most popular smartphones: Huawei G9 Plus, ASUS ZenFone 3, Fujitsu Easy, Huawei Maimang 5, Vibe P2, Motorola Moto Z Play, Samsung Galaxy C7.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 620 APQ8076

• Year of issue: 2016
• Technical process: 28 nm
• Architecture: 4x ARM Cortex-A72 + 4x ARM Cortex-A53
• Video accelerator: Adreno 510

Geekbench score: 4886 points

This chipset is also known as the Snapdragon 652. It is one of the latest processors that is still being manufactured using the 28nm process technology. The creators are not at all embarrassed by the relatively large size of the chip, since it is built mainly into tablets.

The processor consists of eight processing cores. The clock frequency of four of them can reach 1800 MHz. This is enough for the tablet to solve the main tasks without any thought. The chipset also includes the Adreno 510 graphics accelerator. There are no particular complaints about it, because no one will expect excellent graphics performance from a tablet. It should be noted that in theory the chip supports video at 2160p resolution at 30 frames per second. It also boasts Bluetooth 4.1 support and Quick Charge 3.0 proprietary fast charging technology.

Dignity

• Supports devices with higher screen resolutions;
• Large computing power;
• Albeit limited, but still support for 4K video;
• Built-in fast charging technology.

disadvantages

• No Bluetooth 4.2 support;
• Still not the best graphics accelerator.

Most popular devices: Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 Plus 8.0, Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 Plus 9.7.

MediaTek MT6797M Helio X20

• Year of issue: 2016
• Process technology: 20 nm
• Architecture: 2x ARM Cortex-A72 + 4x ARM Cortex-A53 + 4x ARM Cortex-A53
• Video accelerator: Mali-T880MP4, 4 cores, 780 MHz

Geekbench score: 5130 points

Many mobile processors have four or even eight cores. In the case of MediaTek MT6797M Helio X20, their number is brought to ten. As a result, the performance of the chipset is very high. Especially in those applications where serious graphics processing is not required. It should be noted that only two computing cores are especially powerful here - their clock frequency reaches 2300 MHz. The rest of the cores are divided into two groups. One is able to please with a frequency of 1850 MHz, while the other has this parameter fixed at 1400 MHz. But the result in any case is very good, which is confirmed by synthetic tests, and the smartphones themselves - the interface on them does not slow down at all thanks to the chipset.

As for the graphics accelerator, everything is much worse here. In theory, it can handle 4K video viewing and recording at 30fps. But in games, the lack of power is immediately felt. Modern games on a smartphone with such a processor will work, but with simplified graphics. Especially if the device has a Full HD screen or higher. It should also be noted that the processor supports almost any mobile cameras- if only the resolution of the module does not exceed 32 megapixels.

• Year of issue: 2015
• Technical process: 28 nm
• Architecture: ARM Cortex-A72 + ARM Cortex-A53 (ARMv8)
• Video accelerator: Adreno 510

Geekbench score: 4610 points

There are two versions of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 620 processor, also known as the Snapdragon 652. The first is the MSM8976, which was released in 2015. A year later, a slightly more improved version was released - APQ8076, which some received. The products are practically no different from each other. They have eight cores, half of which are capable of increasing the frequency to 1800 MHz. Both processors are endowed with a far from ideal graphics accelerator Adreno 510.

Qualcomm's creation is capable of operating smartphones with a display resolution of up to 2560 x 1600 pixels. As for the camera, it is possible to process data coming from a dual module, the total resolution of which does not exceed 21 megapixels. Everything is in order with the module and with the ability to process data coming from dual-channel LPDDR3 memory.

Dignity

• High performance;
• 4K video playback at 30 fps;
• Theoretical video recording capability at 1080p and 120fps;
• Not very high cost;
• Support dual cameras;
• The screen resolution can be up to 2560 x 1600 pixels.

disadvantages

• Bluetooth 4.2 is not supported;
• The maximum resolution of the camera cannot be very high.

Most popular smartphones: X6S A, Vivo X7, Vivo X7 Plus, LeEco Le2, G5 SE, R9 Plus, Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), ZTE Nubia Z11 Max, Xiaomi Mi Max

When choosing a processor from AMD, you come across a lot of incomprehensible letters and numbers. What do they mean? How do you separate an average processor from a weak one? You will learn about this in our material.

Introduction

Processors before 2010 will not be considered here, as well as server solutions, chips on the AM1 platform, as well as the AMD Ontario line (on this moment not relevant), so the markings shown in this article may not apply to them.

Here is a video that will help you figure it out, but we still recommend that you read the article, as it is more detailed and will be updated in the future.

Architecture

Chips of the latest 4 desktop architectures are currently on the market, and in the second half of 2016 it is planned to present the world with a new Zen architecture with a big jump in performance per clock and reduced to 14 nm, which may help to catch up with Intel in the top segment.

Sockets

Current platforms at the beginning of 2016 include FM2, FM2 + and AM3 +

Processor lines

E - series

Budget processors entry level designed for laptops and netbooks.

E1 has 2 cores on board, and E2 has 4.

Belonging to a particular generation is determined by the first digit:

• 7- Carrizo-L
• 6 - Beema
• 2, 3 - Kabini (excluding old chips before 2012, which have the same number)

Chips of this series are quite small, and if there is a need, you can familiarize yourself with the models by.

APU

AMD processors with integrated graphics core (APU) are divided into lines:

• A4 - 2 cores
• A6 - 2 cores
• A8 - 4 cores
• A10 - 4 cores

A12-8800B falls out of this nomenclature, but you can read about it.

Accordingly, from weaker to more powerful, both in graphics and in the processor part. Here's an example:

The first number indicates the processor cores (generation).

In our case, having the number 7, we get the Kaveri kernels.

It is worth noting that the number 4 in the A4 series on the Richland architecture means a reduced frequency, which leads to a decrease in performance.

850 - indicates performance among similar processors in frequency (more - better)

• P - typical power consumption for mobile processors (35 W)
• B - designation of Pro processors
• M - mobile processor(old designation)
• K - Unlocked for Overclocking
• T - reduced power consumption (stationary PCs)

Interestingly, there are A-processors marked with the FX trademark. As a rule, these are the most powerful laptop processors of the company. They are also built on the APU architecture.

Athlon

Now let's talk about Athlon. In fact, these are the same A - processors, but with a disabled video core for a lower price.

Take as an example

• X4 - stands for 4 processor cores
• 8 - is a pointer to Kaveri kernels (7 - Trinity)

We do not see any point in pointing to earlier models, since even the top-end Athlon X4 860K chip for this socket demonstrates the results of an average chip by modern standards, so we do not advise you to take these processors in 2016. If at first it suits you, then during the upgrade you will have to change and motherboard, which will cost a pretty penny and recoup the money saved on this solution.

• 60 - as in the previous case, indicates the position of the processor in the line
• K - matters too

Fx

Now let's talk about the fastest AMD processors - the FX series. These chips have great overclocking potential and a very affordable price tag. The main drawback arises from the rather outdated architecture and production technology - energy consumption. TDP ratio - performance loses a lot Intel processors, but the price - performance at a very good level. The nomenclature below is not valid for the FX 9xxx - they are the same 8xxx, but with an increased clock speed. Here is the chip we chose as an example:

The first digit indicates the number of cores, in this case 8.

The second indicates the generation

• 3 - Vishera kernels
• 1, 2 - Zambezi kernels

The rest of the numbers indicate the frequency of the chip within the same family, but we believe that it does not matter. We advise you to take the youngest model in the line, since the older ones are exactly the same, but with factory overclocking. Why overpay for factory overclocking, if the "stones" are chasing so well?

If you have any questions, you can visit the site, there you can find some useful information.

This article did not provide information about older chips, as well as about server solutions due to the outdated technology (technical process, architecture) in the former and the specificity of the application and the high cost of the latter. We hope that our material has helped you understand the nomenclature of AMD processors and will help you make the right choice.

This article will compare notebook processors from two leading semiconductor manufacturers - Intel and AMD. The products of the first of them are equipped with an improved processor part and, in this regard, have a higher level of performance. In turn, AMD solutions can boast of a more efficient graphics subsystem.

Division into niches

Comparison and Intel for laptops will be best performed in three niches:

• Low-end processors (they are also the most affordable).
• Mid-range CPUs that combine both a high level of performance and acceptable energy efficiency.
• Chips with the highest level of performance. In this case, performance, autonomy and energy efficiency fade into the background.

If in the first two cases AMD can provide a worthy alternative to Intel, then the premium segment has been completely dominated by the latter company for a long time. The only hope in this regard is for new processor solutions based on the Zen architecture, which AMD is to present next year.

Intel entry-level products

Until recently, this niche from Intel was occupied by Atom products. But now the situation has changed and entry-level laptops are now based on processors The most modest products of this class include only 2 cores, and the most advanced - 4. The following models are relevant for Q3 2016, which are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 - Current Intel CPU models for entry-level mobile PCs.

There are essentially no fundamental differences between these CPU models. They are aimed at solving the most simple tasks and have the lowest level of performance. Also this manufacturer of semiconductor solutions strong point is the processor part, but the integrated graphics subsystem is very weak. Another strength of these products is a high degree of energy efficiency and improved autonomy due to this.

Mid-range solutions from Intel

Cor i3 and Cor i5 are mid-range Intel processors for notebooks. Comparison of their characteristics indicates that the first family is closer to entry-level solutions, and the second - under certain circumstances, can compete with the most productive chips of this company. The detailed specifications of this product family are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 - Parameters of Intel processors for mid-range notebooks.

The characteristics of this class of CPUs are almost identical. The key difference is the improved energy efficiency of the 7U54. As a result, the autonomy in this case will also be better. As for the rest, there are no significant differences between these processors. The price for all chips of this family is the same - $ 281.

Intel premium notebook processors

For the latest generation notebooks, indicates that the most powerful solutions are the i7 family of CPUs. Moreover, in terms of architecture, they practically do not differ from middle-class products. Even the models of video cards are the same in this case. But a higher level of performance compared to mid-range processors is provided by higher clock speeds and an increased size of volatile memory of the 3rd level. The main parameters of the chips of this family are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 - Main characteristics of the i7 CPU family.

The difference between these products is that in the second case, energy efficiency is improved, but at the same time, the performance will ultimately be lower.

AMD Entry-Level Mobile Processors

For notebooks of the two leading manufacturers, this product indicates that Intel, as noted earlier, has a better processor part, while AMD has an integrated graphics subsystem. If in the new laptop the priority is precisely the improved video system, then it is better to pay attention to the laptops of the second manufacturer. Specific models chips with technical specifications are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 - The most recent AMD processors for entry-level notebooks.

Most of these chips have almost identical technical specifications... The key difference here is only in the frequency range and model of the integrated embedded accelerator. It is on the basis of these parameters that you need to make a choice. If you need maximum autonomy, then we choose products with a lower performance. If autonomy comes to the fore, then you will have to sacrifice dynamism for this.

AMD chips for organizing mid-range laptops

FX-9XXXP and A1X-9XXXP are for laptops. Comparison of their characteristics with the entry-level products indicates that they already have 4 compute units versus 2 that are in the entry-level products. Also, in this case, it can compete with discrete entry-level accelerators. But the weak processor part is the factor that significantly reduces the performance of laptops based on these chips. Therefore, you can look in their direction only when, at the minimum cost of a mobile computer, the fastest possible graphics subsystem is needed. The main specifications for this family of CPUs are shown in Table 5.

Table 5 - CPU parameters from AMD for middle class notebooks.

Comparison of notebook processors in the entry-level segment is the most difficult to make. On the one hand, Intel solutions in this case have a lower cost and an improved processor part. In turn, AMD offers mobile PCs with improved graphics subsystem. It is based on the last parameter that it is recommended to buy when choosing an entry-level laptop Pavilion 15-AW006UR from HP. All other things being equal with competing solutions, the video card in this case will have a certain performance margin, and the processor is not that much inferior to the Intel CPU. As a mid-range mobile PC, it is recommended to choose the Aspire E5 - 774 - 50SY from Acer. It has an i5 - 7200U chip, which is only slightly inferior to the flagship products. And others technical specifications it is at an acceptable level for a mid-range laptop. Comparison of laptop processors in the niche of the most productive solutions indicated which is the best to buy mobile computers based on 7th generation i7 chips. The most affordable, but at the same time very equipped version of the laptop, is the IdeaPad 510-15 IKB from Lenovo. It is he who is recommended to buy when choosing the most productive mobile PC. At the same time, the price is quite democratic both for this class of devices, and the equipment is excellent.

Outcomes

Comparison of processors for notebooks of two leading chip manufacturers today clearly and clearly indicates that the leading positions in most cases are occupied by products from Intel. AMD, in turn, lags significantly behind its direct competitor. The only market segment where parity is still maintained is entry-level mobile products, where AMD has a decent alternative. In all other cases, it would be more correct to purchase notebooks based on Intel CPUs. The current situation can be radically changed by the release of processors based on the Zen architecture in 2017. But time will tell whether AMD will succeed in doing this. Now it is most correct in the niche of mid-range and premium mobile PCs to rely on Intel solutions. Although their price is somewhat overpriced, the level of performance more than compensates for this shortcoming.